When a landlord buys a rental property and has a home warranty included the nightmare begins for the local property manager.
Home warranties may have their place with owner occupants, but most property managers I talk to hate them when working on their rentals. Even to the point of refusing to work with them. Many tell their their clients that when problems occur, they will turn the issue back over to the owner.
The problem is that the warranty company sometimes takes an excessive amount of time to get to the property. The warranty company also needs a copayment, and that can be an administrative nightmare for the property manager. Who is to pay the copay? How does the copay get to the vendor or warranty company?
Most property managers have a list of vendors that they like to use. They use them for their reliability, speed, and good prices. When a warranty is used, the vendor is chosen by the warranty company and the service levels can vary quite a bit.
Landlords should keep in mind that warranty companies provide their service to make money. That means they must try to save money on repairs. They often prorate the value of a broken appliance if it cannot be repaired leaving the owner unhappy that they did not get a repaired unit for the cost of the copay.
We have had a few bad experiences with warranty companies, but we do continue to use them when our client has a home warranty. We have a company credit card to pay the copay over the phone and then bill the owner back. That keeps the tenant out of the financial loop.
Anybody have a different view on this issue?
Houses for rent, homes for rent, apartments for rent, rentals.


